tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4959111893158321335.post7402643558142578048..comments2024-03-15T09:20:12.565+00:00Comments on TV Licensing: BBC Confirm Detector Vans Never Used in CourtUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger11125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4959111893158321335.post-63773117702471216642017-12-11T16:00:24.838+00:002017-12-11T16:00:24.838+00:00Pretty sure the TV license predates the internet b...Pretty sure the TV license predates the internet by quite some time!Montynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4959111893158321335.post-31277466057542560132016-08-07T10:17:36.656+01:002016-08-07T10:17:36.656+01:00That's it no more BBC for me, won't watch ...That's it no more BBC for me, won't watch or buy anymore BBC programs. Fed up with all this spying. Maybe we should just scrap all this technology and go back to basics the BBC and the rest will have nothing to get worked up over. We have gone to far with all this technology and enough is enough. Is it not time that the troubles with the Internet where put to bed and switched off. We never had any of this before the internet anyway. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4959111893158321335.post-48356044225171279812011-07-25T15:39:10.074+01:002011-07-25T15:39:10.074+01:00Interesting post.. I think this kind of system is ...Interesting post.. I think this kind of system is cool nowadays.. I'll try to find another information for this.. I am interested about it..Mayiexhttp://www.tvlicencephonenumber.net/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4959111893158321335.post-87887074550546943592011-07-12T11:41:33.735+01:002011-07-12T11:41:33.735+01:00TPUC is mostly full of nonsense, but this is one o...TPUC is mostly full of nonsense, but this is one of the few things they espouse that is actually grounded in reality - revoke the "implied right of access", then get an injunction if they come more than once.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4959111893158321335.post-36661131626315078242011-06-27T17:19:38.604+01:002011-06-27T17:19:38.604+01:00Boils down to people allowing TV light or sound to...Boils down to people allowing TV light or sound to be seen/heard by those outside the property. If they come to the door, refuse them entry, make them go and get a warrant and meanwhile lose the TV for a while. Simples ! This licence is simply another tax on householders.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4959111893158321335.post-80007056879354341362011-05-23T09:25:21.304+01:002011-05-23T09:25:21.304+01:00I advise anyone being hassled by TV Licening to lo...I advise anyone being hassled by TV Licening to look into how to removed their 'Implied Right Of Access' from their property. I worked for me. See the TPUC website for more destails.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4959111893158321335.post-64494642034081341382011-05-20T11:25:51.467+01:002011-05-20T11:25:51.467+01:00"Detection evedence" used for search war..."Detection evedence" used for search warrants.<br />"Yes m'lud I detected a TV with my ears."Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4959111893158321335.post-24876775331394540402011-05-09T20:02:25.822+01:002011-05-09T20:02:25.822+01:00Excellent and thanks for this site.Excellent and thanks for this site.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4959111893158321335.post-35601208544629987572011-04-22T19:45:53.911+01:002011-04-22T19:45:53.911+01:00Detection evidence is used to convince the magistr...Detection evidence is used to convince the magistrate that they have done a professional job of getting evidence.<br /><br />They will see some means of getting a TV signal e.g. aerial, plus will see/hear a TV set in use. They will put in a token effort with some detection device, but won't care too much about the results obtained from using it. They will just say to the magistrate, that a positive result has been obtained from detection, and leave it at that.<br /><br />I recall it somewhere mentioned that TVL claimed 99% certainty of detection with their TV detection equipment. That is a suspiciously high statistical value. What it more likely is, that in the unlikey event that they've screwed up with the general reckoning of the situation, it gives them the excuse that on this particular occasion, the 1% chance of failure with their detection equipment actually happened.<br /><br />Detection equipment is not a concern. They either have all the evidence they need to satisfy themselves before considering using detection equipment, or they will give up and move onto the next victim.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4959111893158321335.post-81766890006489729542011-04-19T20:54:07.885+01:002011-04-19T20:54:07.885+01:00http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v4gdhK7FOPY&fea...http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v4gdhK7FOPY&feature=mfu_in_order&list=UL<br /><br />Very, very interesting!!!!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4959111893158321335.post-23535475544126224472011-04-02T00:19:09.562+01:002011-04-02T00:19:09.562+01:00Great work!! Kudos to you, sir!! :-)))Great work!! Kudos to you, sir!! :-)))33_hertzhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12668631190842375681noreply@blogger.com